Lesson Objective

Students will evaluate performances and propose improvements using established criteria.

How do singers evaluate performance quality?
What criteria define expressive and effective choral performance?
How can evaluation improve future performances?

Criteria, critique, evaluation, reflection, communication, expression

MU:Re9.1.E.IIa
MU:Re9.1.E.IIb

Students evaluate arguments, justify conclusions, and support claims with evidence.

Students evaluate performances using musical evidence and criteria.
DOK 1: Students identify criteria related to vocal and ensemble performance.
DOK 2: Students apply evaluation criteria to performances.
DOK 3: Students analyze strengths and areas for improvement using evidence.
DOK 4: Students evaluate performances and propose specific refinements to improve communication and artistry.

valuation and reflection are essential components of growth in music and professional settings.

Students may think evaluation is only subjective opinion.

Rubrics, reflection prompts, peer critique, discussion, and modeled evaluation examples

DOK 1: Students identify criteria for effective vocal and ensemble performance.
DOK 2: Students apply rubrics and criteria to evaluate performances.
DOK 3: Students analyze strengths and weaknesses using musical evidence.
DOK 4: Students evaluate performances and propose detailed improvements for future rehearsals and performances.