Unit 8: Seaperch Reflection
Duration of Days: 6
The Iterative Design Loop: Understanding that "failure" in a test is simply a data point used to improve the next design.
Root Cause Analysis: Learning to distinguish between a symptom (the ROV moved slowly) and a cause (the wax in the motor housing created too much internal friction).
Technical Communication: How to translate a physical experience into a professional report or presentation.
Preventative Maintenance: The importance of "freshwater rinses" and drying to prevent galvanic corrosion on marine equipment.
The "Teardown" Inspection: Carefully disassemble the ROV, checking the motor seals for any water ingress and the PVC joints for stress fractures.
Data Comparison: Compare their final "Challenge" times against their initial "Mission Proposals" to see if their ROV performed as predicted.
The "Design Redo" Sketch: Redraw their ROV frame, incorporating three specific changes they would make if they had to start the class over again (e.g., "I would move the vertical thruster 2 inches forward to stop the nose-diving").
Equipment Salvage: Properly clean, dry, and organize the reusable components (control boxes, motors, and remaining PVC) for the next class.
-
The "Mission Debrief" Presentation: A 5-minute team presentation or a 2-page "After Action Report" (AAR).
-
Success Criteria: The report must include:
-
The High Point: The most successful moment of the build or challenge.
-
The "Critical Failure": A specific technical problem they encountered and how they "field-fixed" it.
-
The Engineering Advice: One piece of "Expert Advice" they would give to next year’s students to help them avoid the same mistakes.
-
| Lesson # | Lesson Title | Duration of Days |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forensic Engineering and Teardown | 3 |
| 2 | The "Version 2.0" Redesign Proposal | 3 |