Lesson 3: Information Warfare and Narrative Control
Duration of Days: 1
Lesson Objective
Students will analyze how information warfare, propaganda, and media framing shape public understanding of the Russia–Ukraine war and complicate accountability during ongoing conflicts.
How do governments and institutions use information to influence how wars are understood, justified, or ignored?
Information warfare
Propaganda
Disinformation
Misinformation
State-controlled media
Narrative framing
Digital surveillance
Censorship
D2.His.5.9-12 Analyze how historical contexts influence perspectives and interpretations
D2.Civ.10.9-12 Analyze the impact of public opinion on public policy
D2.Civ.14.9-12 Analyze historical, contemporary, and emerging means of changing societies
Students practice evaluating source reliability, identifying bias, and distinguishing claims from evidence, skills central to evidence-based reading and argumentation tasks.
This lesson examines information as a weapon of war. Students explore how states manage narratives through media control, selective reporting, and digital manipulation, and why truth becomes contested during active conflicts.
Purpose: Prepare students to critically assess sources and claims before drawing conclusions about legality or responsibility.
DOK: 2–3
Students connect their own media consumption habits to global conflicts, recognizing how algorithms, platforms, and state narratives influence what they see and believe.
Assuming false information only comes from one side
Believing access to more information guarantees accuracy
Confusing misinformation with deliberate disinformation
Side-by-side comparison of contrasting news headlines
Structured discussion prompts to support hesitant speakers
Graphic organizers distinguishing claims, evidence, and interpretation
Students respond in writing to a prompt explaining how narrative control affects public understanding and international response during war.
Reading and question worksheet on information warfare
Examples of media reporting from multiple perspectives
Teacher-facilitated source evaluation discussion